Disclaimer: Any information
obtained here is not to be construed as medical OR legal advice.
The decision to vaccinate and how you implement that decision
is yours and yours alone. Who’s telling
the truth?
by Lynne McTaggart November 1998. http://www.wddty.co.uk/
"A study carried out by Dr Andrew Wakefield
at the Royal Free Hospital in London and published in The
Lancet (28 Feb. 1998) revealed a possible association between
the MMR vaccine and the development of inflammatory bowel
disease and autism, immediately denied by the government and
the medical community, who urged parents to continue to give
their children the triple jab, lest a "social tragedy"
- i.e., a measles epidemic - ensue. And now the government
is quoting a recent Finnish study of 3m children, also published
in The Lancet (2 May 1998), which could make no such association
between the vaccine and autism. Wakefield's research team,
however, still advise parents to have the jabs separately
until further research is carried out. Since then, parents’
confidence in the vaccine has dropped, some mothers even considering
the MMR vaccine more dangerous than measles itself and national
vaccine coverage has fallen by 1 to 2%. The scientific facts
below are offered in answer to the official ‘party line’ quotes
shown in bold.
"The link between autism and the
vaccine is purely coincidental."
Dr Wakefield and his team conducted the study
over 12 children referred to the hospital having a history
of diarrhoea and abdominal pain. The children had been all
developing normally when they suddenly lost their speech and
other skills. Significantly, all 12 had intestinal abnormalities,
with 11 showing patchy, chronic inflammation of the colon,
7 exhibiting abnormal growths of small nodules of lymphoid
tissues and two suffering from thrush-like ulcers, reported
Wakefield, markedly in excess of anything seen before. Since
publishing the study, the team has examined 48 other children
with similar behaviour problems after receiving the vaccine,
46 of whom exhibited bowel disorders similar to those seen
in the study subjects. More than could be attributed to chance,
believe Wakefield's team. Their hypothesis is children genetically
susceptible to autism may have their intestinal function damaged
by the vaccine, which could then allow food by-products called
peptides to pass through the intestinal walls, disrupting
brain function and development. Urine tests on the subjects
caused Wakefield to notice B12 deficiencies, a substance necessary
for the normal development of the central nervous system.
According to solicitors Hodge, Jones and Allen,
who have been contacted by some 1,500 families whose children
have allegedly been damaged by the vaccine, autism is by far
the most common side effect occurring twice as much as any
others. Many of their clients have videotapes showing their
child normally developing from birth—walking, assimilating
a small vocabulary and interacting with the family—and suddenly
losing speech and social interaction, regressing into behaviour
patterns which are considered to be autistic, such as severe
communication difficulties or repetitive and obsessive movements.
Cases include a child developing normally until the age of
4, a bilingual three-and-a-half and triplets, who all three
developed behaviour considered typical of autism. All these
cases cannot only be coincidental, since autism is normally
diagnosed at a much earlier age. Doctors increasingly have
been reporting cases of "atypical autism" described
as a disease where the child is developing normally and then
suddenly develops autistic behaviour, unlike common autism,
which starts from birth. A decade ago, 350 cases of autism
were reported each year. According to the National Autistic
Society, nationwide, there are now 518,000 cases.
"The Finnish study proves that
there is no link between inflammatory bowel disease and autism."
At first glance, the evidence from the vaccination
campaign launched in Finland in 1982 to administer the MMR
vaccine to all children at 12-15 months and then at age 6
appears compelling. All side effects were supposed to be reported.
The study could find no link between inflammatory bowel disease
and autism among 31 subjects who developed gastrointestinal
symptoms. However, unlike Wakefield's study which began on
children diagnosed with an autistic-spectrum disorder and
then he made the link with the bowel problems, here, the Finnish
doctors carried out a passive study reliant upon their capacity
or will to notice and report any abnormal reactions to the
vaccine. Many doctors who were not particularly looking for
autism as a side-effect, may not have connected it with the
vaccine or bothered to record cases. Furthermore, there were
some serious side effects, even among the 31 supposedly benign
cases of bowel problems.
"There is no evidence that the
MMR causes long-term brain damage."
Scientists accept that vaccination can cause
encephalitis, an inflammation of the brain resulting in a
bulging and red fontanel in infants. Doctors recognise it
happens, but insist it occurs only once in every 100,000 cases.
The child may seem to recover completely, but he may actually
have suffered some long-term damage. In many instances—whether
epilepsy, autism or minimal brain damage—what ‘bent the twig’
is an attack of encephalitis in infancy, caused in most cases
by routine vaccination. When the Public Health Laboratory
Service first tested the MMR vaccine on thousands of children,
convulsion cases were reported – 1 subject out of 400 – but
the PHLS said the incidence was acceptable, estimating all
babies would recover completely, even though no long-term
studies were ever done to see if they were minimally brain
damaged or had learning difficulties. "Most symptoms
are mild and the children will recover," said Dr N. Begg,
a consultant epidemiologist with the PHLS. The most definitive
and largest study was conducted by the US Center for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDS), using database technology to
monitor the progress of 500,000 children. They identified
34 major side effects to the jabs, ranging from asthma, blood
disorders, infectious diseases, diabetes and neurological
disorders, including meningitis, polio and hearing loss. But
it was the incidence of seizure (epilepsy, convulsions and
fainting) that leaped off the graph. Its rate increased three
times the norm 24 hours after receiving the DPT (diphteria-pertussis-tetanus)
and, after the MMR vaccine was administered, 2.7 times within
4-7 days and 3.3 times within 8-14 days (Pediatrics, 1997;
99: 765-73). Similarly, the PHLS found that the vaccine increased
seizure risks by 3 and that 2/3 of the seizures were imputable
to the measles component alone (The Lancet, 1995; 345: 567-9).
The mumps portion can cause encephalitis. Studies conducted
in Germany, Canada and Yugoslavia boil down to that conclusion
too.
"Deaths from measles are common
in some European countries and this is directly related to
poor vaccine coverage" (Norman Begg –BMJ, 14
Feb 1998).
Deaths from measles are not common in developed
countries and the virus doesn't strike and kill randomly.
When blood concentration of vitamin A is low, the outer layer
of our mucous membranes become scaly and the turnover of cells
decreases, thus enabling the virus to infect the body. An
acute vitamin A deficiency would result in eye damage, respiratory
diseases and diarrhoea. However, even well-nourished children
may be subjected to such a deficiency.
"Deaths from measles… are directly
related to poor vaccine coverage" (Norman Begg
again).
The British CDS and PHLS jointly attempted to
demonstrate that in areas where coverage with the DPT vaccine
was high, whooping cough was 10 to 100 times lower than where
immunisation was "disrupted" by "anti-vaccine
movements". The truth is that Holland has suffered an
epidemic of whooping cough, despite its 96% vaccination rates,
the same is happening in Norway and Denmark.
"The vaccine is perfectly safe."
This is what you will hear from most GPs or
nurses. During the 1994 campaign Operation Safeguard, the
British government stated that "side effects to booster
jabs are very unlikely, having been carefully studied by looking
at large numbers of children in the USA" — although no
such study had been conducted at that time. No vaccine is
known to be completely safe, and the MMR jab is among those
with the most reported side effects.
Bulletin of Medical Ethics editor Dr R. Nicolson
points out: "The government has to change its approach
to give people an honest picture of what we do and do not
know. There are remarkably few interventions in medicine that
don’t carry some risk. So to say that vaccines are perfectly
safe is highly unlikely." Until long-term safety studies
are carried out, if you want your child vaccinated against
the MMR, but don’t want the triple jab, insist that your doctor
give the shots separately. If he can’t get the supplies, write
to your MP demanding them. If you don't want the shots, make
sure your child's level of vitamin A is high. You may also
wish to investigate homoeopathic nosodes, which have some
evidence of success. If a booster shot is offered, insist
on a blood test to check your child's antibody levels to these
diseases before allowing him to be subjected to a knee-jerk—and
potentially dangerous—jab.
* Lynne MacTaggart is joint editor of
‘Natural Parent’ and of ‘What Doctors Don’t Tell You.’ For
subscriptions ring 020 8944 9555. ‘Natural Parent’ magazine
is bi-monthly £24.95 or £2.50 on newsstands. ‘The
Vaccination Bible’ (£6.95 from them too) is a comprehensive
book that goes in depth into every jab. It’s full of facts,
figures and scientific evidence, much from America.
back to top
back to vaccination index
page |