WHAT GOOD IS PRAYER?
(one of medicine's best-kept secrets -
answers by Larry Dossey MD)
Q: Can you cite specific research that supports your theory
that prayer can help people heal?
In 1998, Dr. Elisabeth Targ and her colleagues at California
Pacific Medical Center in San Francisco, conducted a controlled,
double-blind study of the effects of "distant healing," or
prayer, on patients with advanced AIDS. Those patients receiving
prayer survived in greater numbers, got sick less often,
and recovered faster than those not receiving prayer. Prayer,
in this study, looked like a medical breakthrough.
In 1988, Dr. Randolph Byrd conducted a similar study at
San Francisco General Hospital involving patients with heart
attack or severe chest pain. He found that patients receiving
prayer did much better clinically than those who did not.
Currently, Dr. Mitchell Krucoff at Duke University Medical
Center in Durham, North Carolina, is studying the effects
of prayer on patients undergoing cardiac procedures such
as catheterization and angioplasty. Patients receiving prayer
have up to 100% fewer side effects from these procedures
than people not prayed for.
These are impressive double-blind studies, meaning that
no one knows who is receiving prayer and who isn't. This
eliminates or at least reduces the placebo effect, which
is the power of suggestion or positive thinking. However,
the studies I find most impressive are not done on humans.
For example, when bacteria are prayed for, they tend to grow
faster; when seeds are prayed for, they tend to germinate
quicker; when wounded mice are prayed for, they tend to heal
faster. I like these studies because they can be done with
great precision, and they eliminate all effects of suggestion
and positive thinking, since we can be sure the effects aren't
due to the placebo effect. Mice, seeds, and microbes presumably
don't think positively!
Q: How do you see these concepts being incorporated into
the current medical model?
My wife and I were recently invited to consult with a large
hospital in a major city. The CEO and a few physicians on
the staff had become aware of the evidence supporting the
health effects of religious devotion and prayer. How, they
asked, should they respond to this evidence? Should they
relegate responsibility to the clergy or to hospital chaplains?
Should the physicians and nurses play an active role? A meeting
was held that involved prominent leaders of the community.
One woman stated, "If I were sick and came to this hospital,
and you didn't offer me some form of spiritual support, I
would be very angry!"
This illustrates the situation our healing institutions
face. The public, by and large, wants spiritual support to
be available. A survey on the East Coast found that 75% of
hospitalized patients believed their doctor should be concerned
about their spiritual welfare; and 50% wanted their physician
to pray not only for them, but with them. In response to
the evidence showing a positive role of prayer and religious
practices on health, nearly 50 medical schools currently
offer courses in this area. The fact that our young doctors
are now learning about these issues is an important indicator
of where we are headed.
SOURCE: http://www.dosseydossey.com/larry/QnA.html
SEE ALSO: Dr Winston Morrow on prayer
BACK TO SOUL STUFF HOME |
