|
MECHANISMS OF ALLERGY
Leaky
Gut Syndrome
Now we come to yet another model of health
and disease, concerning the way food residues are dealt with by the gut.
It is important to realize that the
contents of the bowel are outside the
body. If you imagine a piece of string entering at the mouth and emerging from
the anus, you will readily see this is true. The defined space of the bowel (or
lumen) contains a considerable immunological and toxic burden, including
potentially allergenic food residues, waste toxins, food toxins (both natural
toxins and artificially added man-made chemicals), bacteria, parasites and free
radicals released by many processes taking place. Precisely because of our very
intimate entanglement with this space, our bodies need to be protected from
these deleterious substances.
There are a number of defence
mechanisms which ensure the danger is contained. The lining of the bowel is
designed to be impenetrable to this degraded matter and accepts molecules
specially chosen for absorption. There is also an important immune defence system right on site in the wall of the intestine,
to overwhelm and contain suspect immune material, before it breaks free and
enters the circulation. Naturally, at times, this membrane protective layer is
overburdened, especially if our lifestyle is abusive, and may let through some
of the toxins. These enter the blood in the intestinal network of veins and are
then transported to the liver, where detoxification takes place. The liver is
our major defence organ, designed to detoxify
chemicals before the cleansed blood is allowed to re-enter the normal
circulation.
A serious problem can arise once the
impenetrability of the gut mucosa is impaired. We call this “leaky gut
syndrome” (of course!) and a whole cascade of problems can ensue, giving us yet
another model of food allergy/intolerance and toxic overload.
The commonest causes of
damage to the gut wall are:
·
Viruses
·
Bacteria
·
Protozoa (amoeba etc)
·
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
·
Oxidative damage by active oxygen species |
What is supposed to
happen is that our food is broken down in to small generic molecules: sugars go
to glucose, for instance and proteins to amino acids. But if the digestive
process is defective, the food remains considerably unaltered and remains
identifiable by its immunological source. In other words “wheat-ness” or
“pork-ness” of the food survives. This is then capable of setting up and
allergic reaction, to wheat or pork, or whatever culprit is to blame. Even this
wouldn’t be a problem, if the larger food molecules would only stay put: in the
lumen of the bowel.
Unfortunately, as a
result of increased permeability, the larger immunologically-active
molecules escape into the blood, set up immune complexes, and wreak havoc. This results in an inflammatory process,
which can affect all parts of the body, including the gut. This in turn leads
to further loss of integrity of the gut wall and further leakage. Thus food allergy
can become a cause of the problem, as well as the result, and a kind of vicious
circle is entered.
The liver tries to
handle these extra-large molecules and remove absorbed toxins, which should
have remained behind in the bowel. When this happens the liver is also
overloaded, leading to compromise of the cytochrome
p-450 detox system (see
detox), with
resultant escape of toxins, production of excess free radicals and loss of
nutritional essentials, such as glutathione and other sulphur-containing amino
acids. The liver has to dispose of toxins somewhere and usually this ends up in
the bile (most mercury, for example, is excreted into the bile). “Toxic bile”
in turn will injure the gut mucosa and a second vicious circle is in progress.
Toxic bile is also known to lead to chronic pancreatitis
and possible pancreatic cancer (Braganza, J.M.,
Pancreatic disease: a casualty of hepatic "detoxification"? Lancet, 1983. ii: p. 1000-1002.).
But it is worse. For
every toxic molecule excreted in the bile, the liver has given up one molecule
of precious glutathione, to create a conjugate. That is what is supposed to
happen. But when the conjugate enters the bowel and encounters more toxic bile
with active free radicals, these attack the conjugate and release the toxin
once more. The glutathione molecule is
wasted and the toxin is back on the loose.
You will see at once why
a diet rich in antioxidants is really essential in combating the chemical
plague of our world. We cannot go on squandering our biological reserve in this
way, without facing increased risk of cancer and, of course, accelerating the
ageing process.
Table of symptoms which
may indicate leaky gut syndrome
-
Chronic fatigue
-
Joint and muscle pains
-
Fevers of unknown origin
-
Food allergy and intolerance
-
Abdominal pain
-
Abdominal distress
-
Variable bowel habit
-
Skin rashes
-
Toxic feelings (“constipated”,
“liverish”)
-
Woolly brain syndrome
-
Schizophrenia
-
Poor exercise tolerance
Beware: with all such lists, there can be more than one cause of these
symptoms.
|
Verifying leaky gut
syndrome
A neat
and useful model. But is it valid? A test has been developed to establish
whether or not the gut is releasing larger molecules than are biologically
acceptable. It concerns absorption of two complex sugars, mannitol
and lactulose.
Mannitol is a relatively small
molecule and should be absorbed, lactulose is larger and should
not be absorbed significantly.
The patient fasts and both sugars are administered simultaneously. The
information which can be gained is interesting:
·
If the absorption of mannitol is
low, suspect malabsorption
·
If the absorption of lactulose is
high, suspect leaky gut
·
If both are normal, this suggests healthy gut performance
In fact what is normally
measured in the mannitol/lactulose ratio. A
recent study published in the Lancet found that the lactulose-mannitol
ratio was an accurate predictor of relapse when measured in patients with Crohn's disease who were clinically in remission (Wyatt,
J., et al., Intestinal permeability and the prediction of relapse in Crohn's disease. Lancet, 1993.
341(8858): p. 1437-9).
|